You are here
Opinions
The District of Arizona offers a database of opinions for the years 2012 to current, listed by year and judge.
Judicial opinions from the District of Arizona, as well as other participating courts from throughout the nation, can also be accessed through the U.S. Government Publishing Office's United States Courts Opinions web page. To view judicial opinions on the GPO’s website, click here.
Date |
Description | Judge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/05/14 |
Gould Et Al V. Wisniewski Et Al (2:12-ap-01213-EWH) 05/05/14 Memorandum Decision |
Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired) | |
| 05/05/14 |
Gould v. Wisniewski (2:12-ap-01213-EWH) 05/05/14 Holding: Debtors have satisfied the requirements of § 523(a)(2)(A) with respect to the First Advance in the principal amount of $100,000, plus interest, costs and fees calculated pursuant to the Note up to the petition date. |
Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired) | |
| 01/24/14 |
Scannell V. Jp Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. Et Al (2:13-ap-00302-DPC) 01/24/14 Order Setting Priority of Liens |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 01/24/14 |
Scannell v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al (2:13-ap-00302-DPC) 01/24/14 Holding: The parties present an issue of first impression, namely, which has priority in Arizona: a restitution lien or a purchase money deed of trust? The Court concludes that a purchase money deed of trust against real property has priority over an earlier recorded restitution lien. |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 01/14/14 |
Joseph Otto Letizia and Zhanhong Chen (3:13-bk-09233-RJH) 01/14/14 Holding: The issue presented is whether the Debtors may exempt two vehicles, concededly utilized primarily for business purposes in a sole proprietorship, using Arizona’s personal item exemptions provided in A.R.S. § 33-1125(8). The Court holds that debtors in Arizona, doing business as sole proprietors, may not exempt vehicles used primarily for business using Arizona personal item exemptions, and instead must use Arizona’s tools of the trade exemptions. |
Judge Randolph J. Haines (retired) | |
| 01/14/14 |
Joseph Otto Letizia And Zhanhong Chen (3:13-bk-09233-RJH) 01/14/14 Order Sustaining Objection to Claimed Exemptions |
Judge Randolph J. Haines (retired) | |
| 09/20/13 |
Desert Road Builders et al v. Kelland Investments, LLC (0:10-ap-01392-EPB) 09/20/13 Holding: The Court finds and concludes that Defendant failed to prove that the transaction was an equitable mortgage, rather than a sale. Therefore, judgment in favor of Plaintiffs. |
Chief Judge Eddward P. Ballinger, Jr. | |
| 09/20/13 |
Desert Road Builders Et Al V. Kelland Investments, Llc (0:10-ap-01392-EPB) 09/20/13 Order for Matter Taken Under Advisement |
Chief Judge Eddward P. Ballinger, Jr. | |
| 09/19/13 |
Peter Peter Cottontail, Llc (2:12-bk-23574-RJH) 09/19/13 Opinion re: Enforceability of Unsigned Loan Modification Agreement |
Judge Randolph J. Haines (retired) | |
| 09/19/13 |
Peter Peter Cottontail, LLC (2:12-bk-23574-RJH) 09/19/13 Holding: The issue in this case is whether a loan modification agreement negotiated between the Debtors and Everkrisp Vegetables, Inc. satisfied the Arizona Statute of Frauds or any of its exceptions. The Court concludes that the agreement did satisfy the Arizona Statute of Frauds, and even had it not, exceptions to the Statute of Frauds apply in this case to make the agreement’s terms enforceable. |
Judge Randolph J. Haines (retired) |