You are here
Opinions
The District of Arizona offers a database of opinions for the years 2012 to current, listed by year and judge.
Judicial opinions from the District of Arizona, as well as other participating courts from throughout the nation, can also be accessed through the U.S. Government Publishing Office's United States Courts Opinions web page. To view judicial opinions on the GPO’s website, click here.
Date |
Description | Judge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/09/13 |
Blanco Et Al V. Beneficial Mortgage Co. Of Arizona (4:11-ap-01812-EWH) 01/09/13 Memorandum Decision |
Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired) | |
| 01/09/13 |
Val-Mid Associates, L.L.C. (4:12-bk-20519-JMM) 01/09/13 Memorandum Decision |
Judge James M. Marlar (recalled) | |
| 01/07/13 |
Everardo Quintero-Favela (0:12-bk-18101-JMM) 01/07/13 Memorandum Decision |
Judge James M. Marlar (recalled) | |
| 01/07/13 |
Ruben Villalobos And Kim Villalobos (0:12-bk-18838-JMM) 01/07/13 Memorandum Decision |
Judge James M. Marlar (recalled) | |
| 01/07/13 |
Thomas Fernandez And Jamie Fernandez (0:12-bk-19916-JMM) 01/07/13 Memorandum Decision |
Judge James M. Marlar (recalled) | |
| 01/04/13 |
Michelle Bryanna Perry (0:12-bk-16486-JMM) 01/04/13 Memorandum Decision |
Judge James M. Marlar (recalled) | |
| 12/28/12 |
Timothy Ray Wright (2:09-bk-32244-SSC) 12/28/12 Holding: The parties seek a determination on the existence of a deficiency claim. It is the Court’s belief that resolution of “all claims” in the settlement of the Adversary Proceeding encompassed said deficiency claim. This settlement between the Debtor and MidFirst resulted in a final agreed order that required the dismissal of the Adversary Proceeding with prejudice. MidFirst’s attempt to resurrect this claim, without a specific reservation in the final order dismissing the Adversary Proceeding, months after the settlement, and more than a year after the sale of the Properties, is without a legal basis. |
Judge Sarah S. Curley (retired) | |
| 12/28/12 |
Timothy Ray Wright (2:09-bk-32244-SSC) 12/28/12 Memorandum Decision Re: Debtor's Objection to Midfirst Bank's Proof of Claim |
Judge Sarah S. Curley (retired) | |
| 12/27/12 |
Namwest, Llc Et Al V. Namwest-Town Lakes, Llc Et Al (2:08-ap-00860-CGC) 12/27/12 Under Advisement Decision Re: Attorney Fees |
Judge Charles G. Case II (retired) | |
| 12/27/12 |
Namwest, LLC et al v. Namwest-Town Lakes, LLC et al (2:08-ap-00860-CGC) 12/27/12 Holding: Although the Court has the discretion to grant attorneys’ fees because the claims arose out of contract, the Court denies the Namwest Parties’ applications for attorneys’ fees. The Kohan Parties’ factually complex claims had merit. The $640,000 fees requested would create an extreme hardship that would discourage others who believe they have oral contracts from bringing tenable claims. Furthermore, the fees requested are unreasonable, and the Court cannot determine if they are directly tied to the claims. |
Judge Charles G. Case II (retired) |